Monday, November 7, 2011

Timdiana reviews Puss in Boots


        This is a tale of destiny. A tale of a supporting character making his way into the spot light. A Tale that is apparently a back story. A tale…well this is not really a tale, more like a review. This is the review of “Puss in Boots”.
So if you are still wondering, the plot of Puss in Boots is a prequel telling the back story of everyone favorite feline. However this story is not without its flaws. The pacing of the story moves rather quickly which creates a very unsatisfying flow. The plot also suffers too much predictability. There is nothing shocking about the story as it pretty much what expect to. So if you are expecting a simple story, then this is the movie for you.
                Antonio Banderas returns as Puss in Boots, and his performance is what you expect. The cast is decent, but there is a shockingly performance in this; and that is Zach Galifianakis as Humpty Dumpty. The character was definitive, interesting and was not too predictable. To top it off, Zach Galifianakis finally got to do something that was not Allen from “the Hangover”.   Overall, it was a surprising cast because it was not overloaded with stars, and it was refreshing to see.

                “Shrek” was known for its witting humor; so it would be expecting to see the same in this film. Surprisingly, the humor was just ok. There were some alright lines here and there, but there is nothing really to talk about.  Thought the laughs were not memorable, the movie did make up for in other elements such as having creative dance sequences.  That is something I guess.

                Perhaps the tale of “Puss in Boots” is not as glamorous as other stories such as “How to Train Your Dragon”; however it is entertaining nonetheless. The film takes it characters seriously and ot does entertain. It is pretty much what you expect from movie about “Puss in Boots”.
3.5 out 5 hats

Timdiana the Reviews: The Twilight Saga New Moon

(Part 1)

(Part 2)

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Silver Screen Review:Paranormal Activity 3

l

Happy Halloween everyone; and being the Halloween Season, it is once again time for another annual horror flick;  however instead of it being another “Saw” addition, a new set of movies has taken its place; a movie that will undoubtedly be sticking around for a while longer. I speak of course about “Paranormal Activity” with its third installment “Paranormal Activity 3”. The third film has broken box office records by having one the best opening nights a horror film has seen in quite some time.

                Before I jump into this review, let me just make one thing perfectly clear: I do not like this serious. I compliment the movies for their practical effects, but that is about it. Everything I have seen in these movies are not worthy of praise. So going into this film, I was a bit skeptical. So does this film deserve the praise it is receiving, or is it just another footage found film. Find out in this review of “Paranormal Activity 3”.

Once again, the film’s plot is another prequel to help explain and understand what happened in the first film, or just make more plot holes, at this rate, it is pretty much a shot in the dark.  The film story takes place in the 1980’s where and shows the early lives of Katie and Kristi, the two girls haunted by the supernatural being throughout the course of the film.  That might seem terrifying, unfortunately, it is nothing new. The plot follows the same structure as the previous two; and at the story goes on, it just leaves me in a state of confusion.

The movie follows four characters: the two girls, their mother and her boyfriend who mysteriously looks like Michah from the first film. As characters, they do nothing for me as the development has been playing the same song for years now and it is not interesting. However, when it comes to performances, I did not mind the two little girls. Sure, I did not care for their characters, but I will give them credit for their performances because I did believe them. Everyone, on the other hand, are just bland uninteresting.

I have no directing notes as every directorial decision has been the same since the previous two. It is like they just a have book for the basic to follow when making “Paranormal Activity”.

When it comes to the scares of the films, there are things I liked and there are things I disliked. I  enjoyed the practical effects of the film. Some of the things they did were actually impressive and looked believable. However the same thing cannot be said about the scares.  The problem is that scares take so long to get to their executions that it feels like seeing Sir Lancelot running towards the castle in “Monty Python and the Holy Grail”; and to make matter worse, this happens all time in the moviw. It comes to the point where the scares of “Paranormal Activity 3” are just not scary.

What can I say? The movie has its moments; unfortunately the scares are only startling and the plot is predictable as well as being full of plot holes. The movie left me disappointed as well as confused; to put it simply, it is “Paranormal Activity”.  2 out 5 hats

Thursday, August 18, 2011

Silver Screen Review: The Help


Sometimes, it is good to get away from the norm, and that can be seen in the new hit film “The Help”. Some may recognize the title. “The Help” is based off the bestselling book written by Kathryn Stocket, the book tells the story of an unlikely friendship in a time where racial differences conflict the country.  The film has already received much praise, so let us see if “the Help” lives up to the buzz. Here is an interesting perspective in this review of “The Help”

Story: The films’ plot is at first is difficult to follow. It feels as if there are a lot of unclear details and it is not difficult to feel lost. However, the film makes up for keeping true to the idea behind the story and making it compelling.   So though the story has its issues, it does make up for getting the idea across.

Characters:  The film’s strongest factor.  The main characters are well developed, and with great performances to go with them. Actresses such as Emma Stone, Viola Davis and Bryce Dallas Howard shine through with their performances as they lead a well rounded cast of actors creating a very impressive ensemble.  One of the only issues was that it could be difficult to believe some of the female parts because they look a bit young for the roles, but that is just nitpicking.
Directing: Tate Taylor helms this film adaption of the bestselling novel.  The major issue with his directing was timing in scenes as well as the pacing in some of the film’s transitions. It felt as if some of the moments came out of nowhere and it is hard to follow the direction behind it.  Though Taylor’s direction was hard to follow at times, he did however make up with a good atmosphere as well as directing some very compelling scenes.

Everything Else: Two things stand out in this film, atmosphere are compelling scenes.  The film’s atmosphere seems very definitive thanks to the movie’s set as well as the lighting. As for the scenes, there are indeed some strong, compelling, and memorable. The scenes showed wonderful symmetry between acting, pacing and technical aspects.

Overall: “The Help” has it issues such as the details in its storytelling technique; however the film makes up in other aspects. The movie showcases terrific acting as well as an atmospheric sense that captures you right into the world of the film. You do not need to be a fan of the book to enjoy this film. “The Help” receives a gracious 4 out of 5 hats.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Silver Screen Review: Rise of the Planet of the Aoes


Another franchise can be added to the list of reboots which just so happens to be “Planet of the Apes”. The film series began in 1968 is back once again with a back story entitled, “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”. The movie is getting a lot of positive reviews, but that remains to be seen with this critic. Is it a movie of the year contender or does it fall short like so many other movies dealing with Apes?   Find out in the review of “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”.

Story:  The film’s plot deal with the events prior to the 1968 classic. In this plot, there are thing that work and things that falls short by failing in execution. What works is the story of Caesar the Ape and his evolutionary rise into the world, which made for compelling storytelling.  What does not work is the plot’s pacing as well as the missing details that would have helped the film’s execution. That aside, the greatest of all the film’s flaws is that there are very few surprises to the story as most of the film’s plot can be seen and deciphered from the advertisement.
Character/Acting:  What can be said when the best character, as well as the best performance, is in fact a monkey. It is not as bad as it sounds. Since the majority of the film is seen through the perspective of Caesar, played by Andy Serkis, it comes to no surprise that he has the most development.  To see a  character having no dialogue and to be able to remain compelling is an impressive feat.  The film also see a great performance from John Lithgow, a decent performance from James Franco, and a complete waste of characters from both Brian Cox and Tom Felton.  However , the biggest issue about the development is how the movie seems to suffer from the cliché of characters being bad for the sake of being bad.

Directing: This film marks the fourth cinematic feature for director Rupert Wyatt.  Wyatt had some good decisions like making a standalone film as well as trying to make the characters and storytelling compelling as possible. Though these elements did succeed, other decisions were not as effective such as a good way to translate the original idea with the new idea.

Everything Else: The movie features the effects of WETA, the company that created the effects of “Avatar” and “The Lord of the Rings”. No Apes were hurt in the making of this film because they were all CG. That being said, the CG is definitive, not the best, but the well defined nonetheless.

Overall: Though not the best reboot, “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” is still a good film. It is compelling and makes for a compelling standalone film, just do not expect too much from this film. “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” receive 3 ½ out of 5 hats.