Most time, I feel that movies and greek mythology just do not go together. Sure, there have been hits such as “300”, but there are also been misses like “Clash of the Titans”. Despite the hits and misses, Hollywood continues to keep this idea going. The latest comes from the mind of Tarsem Singh with his latest film; “Immortals”; a film that looked to be something different with its visuals, and of course its gripping 3d. Does this visually appealing movie stand a chance to break the mediocrity of Greek mythology films? Prepare to set forth in this review of “Immortals”.
The story of the film is about the journey of Theseus, who must become the hero he was meant to be and stop King Hyperion before he can release the Titans and bring chaos to the world. The plot is fairly simple as it is a very classic story. However, this plot has been so many times, that seeing it in this movie makes it feel too generic. There really is not much that stands out in this story. You will most likely forget the plot as soon as the movie ends.
I had no issues with the performances in the film, even with Stephen Dorff in the cast. Unfortunately, like story, the characters are generic and forgettable. The only ones that stand out are Hyperion, played by Mickey Rourke, and the old man, played by John Hurt. Everyone else is epically bland.
As much as I cannot stand 3D, seeing it in “Immortals” in the third dimension was actually
tolerable. It did not feel like a gimmick and it did create some interesting dimensions. However, factors likes this cannot make a movie, and although the visuals are impressive, it is dragged down the staleness of the film.
“Immortals” is ok, but just ok. Asides from the visuals and performances from Mickey Rourke and John Hurt, nothing stands out in this film. It is not painful experience, but it is one that leaves no impression. You will not miss anything if you skip “Immortals”.
3/5 hats.
No comments:
Post a Comment